I noticed on a podcast, (Green and White, I think), that a neutral guest said we weren’t as bad, at the CBS Arena, as many suggested. I agreed with this take. Apart from our pass completion %, which was awful first half, we weren’t that bad. We were the better side in the second half of the second half and the ‘non’ goal came against the run of play. I think Robins had done his homework and negated the threats. The most parsimonious defence in the league against our attack pretty much cancelled each other out!
Coventry had ridiculous pace in that side and did run through our midfield in the first half which was concerning but, after the substitutions (which some criticised) we were looking a real threat. Maybe too little too late. 💚👍
I agree that we had a measure of control in the Cover game and it wasn't a terrible performance. But not sure we had a meaningful chance that I can recall and that's very un-Argyle. Anyway, we need to make sure we go full Argyle in these huge games coming up!
Another great read, thanks.
I noticed on a podcast, (Green and White, I think), that a neutral guest said we weren’t as bad, at the CBS Arena, as many suggested. I agreed with this take. Apart from our pass completion %, which was awful first half, we weren’t that bad. We were the better side in the second half of the second half and the ‘non’ goal came against the run of play. I think Robins had done his homework and negated the threats. The most parsimonious defence in the league against our attack pretty much cancelled each other out!
Coventry had ridiculous pace in that side and did run through our midfield in the first half which was concerning but, after the substitutions (which some criticised) we were looking a real threat. Maybe too little too late. 💚👍
I agree that we had a measure of control in the Cover game and it wasn't a terrible performance. But not sure we had a meaningful chance that I can recall and that's very un-Argyle. Anyway, we need to make sure we go full Argyle in these huge games coming up!